Kamikaze Republicans
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
That someone is Peter Schrag in yesterday's LA Times, calling the Yacht Party California's Kamikazes - a party in terminal decline in the state but determined to take everyone else down with them:

In a state where whites have been just another minority for the better part of a decade, and where Latinos will in another generation be an absolute majority, it may not be surprising that that GOP narrowness leads to a gritty sense of besiegement and a kamikaze mentality that seems ready to take itself over the cliff, and the rest of the state with it....

But in the current crisis, the Democrats have in fact agreed to major cuts; the Republicans remain adamant on revenue. That resistance, as most people must know by now, is made possible by California's nearly unique constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority in the Legislature to enact a budget or increase taxes. If five Republicans -- two in the state Senate, three in the Assembly, both of which have Democratic majorities -- broke ranks, there'd be no gridlock.

But that's only part of the story. In a survey last year by the Public Policy Institute of California, 52% of the state's Democrats identified themselves as liberals, 31% as "middle of the road" and 17% as conservative.

Republicans were far more rigidly conservative: 67% called themselves conservative, 21% called themselves middle of the road and 8% said they were liberal.

So Democrats are not quite as hard-line as the folklore suggests.


One wonders if the LA Times editorial board read Schrag's column closely. Schrag is making excellent points, and hopefully the rest of the state's media will listen and stop lying to their readers that the problem in Sacramento is that legislators won't negotiate - that instead the Yacht Party is determined to claw back some political relevance at the cost of the state's viability.

The Republicans in California are the equivalent of a failed state. The party hasn't been viable on a statewide basis since 1996. 2002 and 2003 saw some momentary gains but those faded, and the only Republican with meaningful statewide success - Arnold - has made distancing himself from his own party a key to his electoral victories. So they exploit the 2/3 rule to maintain a semblance of power and arrest their slide into irrelevance - the Libertarian Party with a few more votes and some actual seats.

Schrag recognizes that the only way this death cult's death grip on the state will be ended is by eliminating the 2/3 rule:

The fastest way to restore responsibility all around is to rejoin the rest of the democratic world and bring back straight majority votes to enact budgets and raise taxes. That would break up the GOP cult, make both parties more responsible to the voters as a whole, force them to make the tough choices and take the heat for the consequences, and -- most important -- get on with the business of governing.


This is an eminently sensible conclusion. It's a shame it's taken weeks, if not months, for the LA Times op-ed page to start making sense on this, but they couldn't hide from reality any longer. The Yacht Party are now the Kamikaze Party, determined to sink the ship of state out of spite and desperation.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
huh
By User from Newport Beach, CA Jan 14th 2009 at 8:45 pm PST (Updated Jan 14th 2009 at 8:45 pm PST)
ok. the republican party hasn't been viable sonce 1996 yet IT is responsible for the mess california is in? this "minority" group is responsible for the incomprehensible orgy of over-spending this state cannot escape? and the ANSWER is to hope for a one-party state (nice democracy, mussolini)run solely by the party you say has all the power already? it just needs even a little MORE authority to make things even worse? a frightening post with its gluttonous thirst for absolute power and intolerance for others views and the checks & balances so integral to the structure of our society. i can hear the goose-stepping of crokshanks thought police army already!
Re: huh
By User from Irvine, CA Jan 16th 2009 at 7:45 pm PST (Updated Jan 16th 2009 at 7:45 pm PST)
It isn't about more power, it's about *less* power. A small minority is able to set policy, and prevent the majority from pulling us up out of a nose dive. Nice attempt at fear mongering though.
Re: huh
By User from Newport Beach, CA Jan 18th 2009 at 5:49 pm PST (Updated Jan 18th 2009 at 5:49 pm PST)
wait. you HAVE power. have totally f_ed things up. now want MORE power. say you need absolute power. and, you want to say to someone who says that's very alarming, that they are "fear mongering." earth to stepford wives irvine...do you not even listen to yourself. how frightening you are! sorry that you live in a democracy. i know it may be a little inconvenient at times! maybe you hitler youth should go live in a totalitarian state, as you so desire. wake-up call!!!!!!!
  

Community Posts

Teabaggers Fail Again
Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:02pm
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Stand with us for women's health
Posted Nov 17, 2009 3:35pm
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Will Pelosi Reject Feinstein's Reckless Bluff?
Posted Nov 12, 2009 11:50am
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Read More >

Recent Comments

Nostradamus 2012 yea
HUMAN EVOLUTION I saw picture Nostradamus 2012 y...

angry?
check out eeztees.com to wear your opinion on your...

Dinesh Malshe
I Have Seen Scientific American India Book... Bio...

Sounds like you could use some fun news...
Meghan McCain's big Republican boobs. I'm not kidd...

Real Courage Indeed!
Thanks Rick - in this day of nay-saying, we need y...


Blog Roll


Calitics
The Bayne of Blog
California Progress Report
California Majority Report
D-Day
DailyKos Down With Tyranny
Fog City Journal
High Speed Rail Blog
Left in SF
The Liberal OC
Living in the O
Michigan Liberal
MyDD
OB Rag
San Diego Politico
Square State
Surf Putah
Sweet Melissa
Unite the Fight