I applaud you for crafting a letter to Judge Walker about camera's in the courtroom. I signed it, but also included the below personal note.

Propriety aside, it is self defeating to "insist" that a Federal judge act in your favor. He is not subject to bluster like a politician, and he is not impressed by arrogance like so many citizens.

He is immune to bullying but not to your tone. Please be careful to set the right one.

--------

The first sentence of this letter reads "we are writing to insist that the trial of Proposition 8 be televised."

Please excuse the zeal of the Courage Campaign. The word "insist" does not convey respect for your position or abilities. Obviously, this is your decision, and you will weigh it judiciously.

As you know, many people are impassioned about this case. A handful will be in the courtroom. Millions more will be elsewhere, checking the internet and television for updates.

Video can give them incomparable access. It lets them see the lawyers' arguments with their inflections and gestures intact. It helps them understand the care you put into your deliberations. It provides access to our justice system, fosters understanding of it and instills trust.

I am a nonfiction writer, and I admit that print cannot compare. It is an excellent medium for stories, ideas and opinions, but the written word inherently distorts the truth. Video just shows it. Even when it is edited, video is an eye not a brain. Of the two, I think that it is the better tool for conveying the realities of this case.

Thank you for your time and consideration.