Post from Julie Sanders Blog:
Who will fight for the gays?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
President Elect Obama made a poor decision yesterday when he chose Evangelical Reverand Rick Warren of Orange County, CA., as the spiritual speaker of his historical inauguration. When Pastor Rick Warren was asked to clarify a statement -- if he actually equates same-sex marriage with incest, pedophilia and polygamy -- his answer was direct and unequivocal: "Oh, I do."

As a US President, Obama cannot please everyone and he will have to walk a fine line to keep everyone supporting him and I understand that. What I can't understand is the message he is sending to the last unprotected minority group yet to receive equal protection under our Federal and State laws. The Gay population. A group that solidly backed his campaign and helped to make him the next US President? This is the thanks he gives?

This is a huge blow to a group of people's lives and civil rights that religious extremists have vowed to make sure gays don't receive. This isn't even about marriage--it's about equality and Obama is smart enough to know that. This is a shameful political move and Obama is trying to broaden his support base to include evangelical Republicans. Reaching across the aisle so to speak. It's just political strategy as usual, BUT it comes at the expense of a minority group of people who worked tirelessly to get him into office. Not to mention a minority group of people who are publicly discriminated against and not protected under the law in the majority of this country.

If this sort of incident came at the expense of Jews or Blacks in 2008, people would be outraged. But gays? Different story every time. Unfortunately. One day I hope people will wake up to realize that even if same sex marriages become legal in California (for good!) the people in these marriages will have no protection under the law in 40 out of our 50 states. This means that if a Californian same sex couple who is married should be transferred in their job to another state, there is a good chance they will end up in a state where they have no rights or protection for their family or their children or their joint assets. This is the bigger issue here. Their family and marriage will no longer exist under the law! What happens then? We don't even have an answer to that! Why should these citizens who are not protected under their states law's be paying the same state taxes as everyone else? If a gay couple's home and/or property is not even going to be protected should something happen, then why are they paying the same taxes as everyone else who's families and properties and assets are protected? This is called Separate and Not Equal. Again, this is not about marriage nor religious beliefs. We cannot grant protection to some of our citizens and not others. Anyone care to remember Jim Crow laws?

Housing discrimination refers to discrimination against potential or current tenants by landlords. In the United States, there is no federal law against such discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, and only thirteen states along with many major cities have enacted laws prohibiting it. What the US needs is a Federal Law that protects gays in ALL 50 states and we don't have that. It's called Civil Rights and equal protection under the law.

Many people will do anything they can to stop the normalization and acceptance of gay people into society as a result of their extremist religious views but no matter what they think the Bible says, 10% of the world's population is gay and always has been! And those numbers don't even include bi-sexuals which is a huge group of people. I know people will want to argue that number, but what needs to be assesed here is the number of gay people that will never make it public out of fear of discrimination and being ostracized from their families and communities. People are born gay, they don't wake up one day and choose it, so at some point, it would be good to start accepting that fact.

Religious extremists (and I say extremists here) have always feared evolution and diversity because that would mean they are unclear about what their religion means to them. They are the ones needing definitions for everything. I have seen the world fight for Jews. I have seen the USA fight for blacks and their equality and their protection under our constitutional laws. Who will fight for the gays? I thought Obama would but clearly I am wrong. Harvey Milk did in the 1970's until he was assassinated in his workplace, SF City Hall, where he was a city Supervisor.

I hope people begin to realize that the definition of marriage changed a long time ago when people were granted the right to marry someone outside of their religion , and then outside of their race (thank god!). The definition of marriage has changed (evolved) several times before. Marriage in today's world is a social institution, but many people will insist it is a religious institution--If this was the case, then Catholics should not be allowed to marry Protestants (under the laws of marriage) and Christians shall be forbidden to marry Jews and so on and so forth. I can think of plenty of marriages that would be illegal if this mentality existed today.

Just when I thought we put in a progressive man in office that would choose to do what's right, and protect all people, he delivered a harsh blow to gay people everywhere. Obama said in his defense speech around choosing Warren that everyone knows he's a fierce advocate for gay rights and their equality. Really? I don't feel that way. I don't even know anymore who will take this on and demand it be a civil rights issue that we start working on fixing now. I feel saddened by the truth of this dim lighted situation gays face. I thought things would be changing for everyone for the better but Obama just killed that notion fast.

I realized yesterday again, that we have a long hard road ahead and the enthusiasm I hoped to feel surrounding Obama's historical inauguration has now been tainted. These are people's lives on the line, and it's a very thin and fragile line until we see Federal Legislation put forth that will protect America's last unprotected minority citizens, the gay population of all 50 states.

I hope you will take action and start speaking to your friends and family on behalf of this very serious civil rights issue. Gay people, like all people, deserve protection under the law. This is not a religion debate.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
more garbage
By User from Newport Beach, CA Dec 19th 2008 at 11:10 pm PST (Updated Dec 19th 2008 at 11:10 pm PST)
why would anyone need to fight for the "civil rights" of a sexual orientation? huh? homosexuals, bisexuals, heterosexuals, asexuals, et al, all have the same civil rights. marriage is SEX based, not sexual orientation based, and is not a "right." who is being denied their basic right to what? what are you going to throw a fit about next? maybe homosexuals should be given the "right" to a handicap permit or the "right" to use a VA hospital! strange and pathetic. obama's inauguration is tainted? NEWS-FLASH...obama is and always has been against gay marriage. and it is an extreme insult to in any way equate gay marriage to the civil rights movement...how dare you. and the gall to use jews as an example as your cronies spew rascist filth against the mormon church. disgusting. you want to label everyone "for 8" as a religious nut when neither i nor any of my friends who voted for 8 have ANY religous beliefs. the problem is that your claims are an illusion without intellectual merit. and 10% of the population? heterosexuals represent 95% of society and the other 5% is made-up of a myriad of sexual preferences with the largest of those groups being homosexuals.
Re: more garbage
By User from San Francisco, CA Dec 20th 2008 at 11:24 am PST (Updated Dec 20th 2008 at 11:24 am PST)
Marriage is sex based? Racist cronies and the Mormon church? You have some wonderful viewpoints. Good luck with that. Protection under the law in all 50 states is in fact a CIVIL RIGHTS movement. This is not an argument about marriage, once again. I guess you missed that part.
  
sorry
By User from Newport Beach, CA Dec 20th 2008 at 12:08 pm PST (Updated Dec 20th 2008 at 12:08 pm PST)
sf user must watch just how much he/she is using. a civil rights movement? for a sexuality? hey..aren't blue eyed people a minority too? there is NO civil rights issue here. gays can marry and have married throughout history. no gay has ever been barred from marriage. sex based? yes. as in gender. get it. you cannot marry a dog or goat or sister or brother or someone of the same sex. that is what marriage is. reality. deal with it.
Re: sorry
By User from San Francisco, CA Dec 21st 2008 at 1:46 pm PST (Updated Dec 21st 2008 at 1:46 pm PST)
It's always a thrill to watch hate driven straight people spend their time on the internet logging on to pro LGBT web sites that don't want them there so they can make their extreme opinions and agendas known. This probably isn't the most effective venue for a hate spewer like you but all are welcome here. That is the beauty of freedom of speech. One of your Civil Rights as an Amercian citizen.

The day that bigots like you stop comparing the sacred love bond that connect two people (regardless of gender) to that of marrying a dog or a goat will be a magificent day indeed. I have been with the same partner for 6 years and let me tell you, the love we share is just like wanting to F**k a dog! You are a lost soul to say such words, and that's you're problem. Good luck with that.

You also say, and I quote your words, "gays can marry and have married throughout history. no gay has ever been barred from marriage." Um, I think you got that one wrong. What on Earth are you smoking? You can go on spitting your ignorant words and your hate filled agenda to me or anyone else you choose, or you could choose to evolve and educate yourself and get your facts straight.

Try reading some history books and tell me what year Black Americans were legally allowed to marry a person outside of their race. Yeah, look it up. It happened here in California. I can only assume that you think Black Americans have always been able to vote or sit on a bus next to a white person or share the same drinking fountain. Right?

Gay people cannot marry under the legal protection of the law and that is what makes this a civil rights issue. Maybe you should go on to a web site where other people like you want to hear this crap about marrying goats, there are plenty of them so be gone already, would ya?

Oh, and maybe someday you'll want to come out of your closet too. Feel free to bring your goats with you. Just a suggestion. Deal with it.
  

Community Posts

Teabaggers Fail Again
Posted Nov 20, 2009 4:02pm
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Stand with us for women's health
Posted Nov 17, 2009 3:35pm
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Will Pelosi Reject Feinstein's Reckless Bluff?
Posted Nov 12, 2009 11:50am
by Robert Cruickshank, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Read More >

Recent Comments

Nostradamus 2012 yea
HUMAN EVOLUTION I saw picture Nostradamus 2012 y...

angry?
check out eeztees.com to wear your opinion on your...

Dinesh Malshe
I Have Seen Scientific American India Book... Bio...

Sounds like you could use some fun news...
Meghan McCain's big Republican boobs. I'm not kidd...

Real Courage Indeed!
Thanks Rick - in this day of nay-saying, we need y...


Blog Roll


Calitics
The Bayne of Blog
California Progress Report
California Majority Report
D-Day
DailyKos Down With Tyranny
Fog City Journal
High Speed Rail Blog
Left in SF
The Liberal OC
Living in the O
Michigan Liberal
MyDD
OB Rag
San Diego Politico
Square State
Surf Putah
Sweet Melissa
Unite the Fight